A teacher is both a cheerleader and a gatekeeper. As a cheerleader, a good teacher is on the sidelines, encouraging students to give it all they've got. A cheerleader believes in the players, wanting each team member to succeed. So the cheerleader shouts, dances, and chants his support to help players/students stay pumped up, to help them believe in themselves. The players, not the game, is the cheerleader's priority.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf7f2/bf7f23b15ac226559e587d52f2622e58c10a6d64" alt=""
Yet my gate keepers also encouraged me - my own personal pep squad! My best teachers did both.
Somehow (magically?), an effective teacher toggles back and forth between these often paradoxical roles: sometimes playing the cheerleader, others, the gatekeeper. Often within the space of a single heartbeat! Metaphorically we do the splits, execute complex tumbling runs and human pyramids, and cheer at the top of our lungs to encourage our students. At the same time, we are expected to maintain and enforce agreed upon standards. We must ensure that the students who pass through our classes have learned what they need to succeed at the next level. As gatekeepers, we "love" and protect our fields, just as my favorite professors did.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e09c/7e09c7a6c304049332b6f359a5322bcd13923889" alt=""
The balance isn't a transcendent ratio, a stable fraction, or even some alchemical miracle. Rather, the balance between playing cheerleader and gatekeeper is dynamic, shifting and evolving with (and even within!) every class and for each student. This half-remembered analogy helps me approach my profession, to be tactical about my technique.
If you remember reading this article, I'd appreciate the reference. It'll be fun to read it after all these years. I wonder how far the interpretation I remember today veers from the author's original intent and meaning.
In a training one time a teacher said she was 90% cheerleader, 10% dominatrix. I like that one too.
ReplyDeleteLOVE the analogy!
ReplyDelete